Biocompatibility assessment of lubricating ophthalmic agents in the context of their physicochemical characteristics

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14739/2409-2932.2026.2.353713

Keywords:

dry eye syndrome, lubricating eye drops, physicochemical properties, surface tension, viscosity, biocompatibility

Abstract

The paper analyzes the impact of key physicochemical properties of lubricating eye drops (viscosity, pH, and surface tension) on their biocompatibility with ocular surface tissues. The necessity of a strict correlation between the quantitative characteristics of the preparations and the physiological parameters of the tear fluid is substantiated to ensure a long-term therapeutic effect in dry eye syndrome. The results obtained are of practical importance for improving production technologies and enhancing the quality of modern ophthalmic agents.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the physicochemical properties of lubricating eye drops on their biocompatibility and ocular surface tolerance.

Materials and methods. The study involved samples of lubricating eye drops: “Optinol 0.4 %”, “Aritear”, “Vial Sleza”, “Artelac Hypromellose”, and “Oftolik Ultra”. Density and pH were determined according to the methods of the State Pharmacopoeia of Ukraine. Surface tension was measured using the stalagmometric method and viscosity was determined by capillary viscometry. All measurements were performed at a physiological temperature of 35 °C. Statistical analysis of the results was carried out using standard statistical methods.

Results. The physicochemical parameters of the lubricating eye drops “Optinol 0.4 %” and “Artelac Hypromellose” were found to optimally meet biorelevant criteria. Artelac Hypromellose was the only sample whose surface tension, both in pure form and upon model dilution, corresponds to the physiological norm, ensuring optimal spreading. While other preparations significantly lost their surface activity upon dilution, “Oftolik Ultra” and “Optinol 0.4 %” demonstrated the most stable and comfortable viscosity.

Conclusions. A comparative analysis of the physicochemical properties (density, pH, surface tension, and viscosity) of five lubricating eye drop samples with different chemical natures of their active components was conducted. It was established that according to the complex of biorelevant criteria, the parameters of “Optinol 0.4 %” and “Artelac Hypromellose” are the closest to the physiological norm. It has been proven that stalagmometric and viscometric methods are effective tools for rapid quality control and predicting the biocompatibility of liquid ophthalmic agents.

Author Biographies

L. M. Ivanets, Ivan Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine

PhD, Associate Professor of Department of General Chemistry

M. V. Vlasyuk, Ivan Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine

Student

References

  1. Rolando M, Merayo-Lloves J. Management Strategies for Evaporative Dry Eye Disease and Future Perspective. Curr Eye Res. 2022;47(6):813-23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2022.2039205
    | |
  2. Jones L, Craig JP, Markoulli M, Karpecki P, Akpek EK, Basu S, et al. TFOS DEWS III: Management and Therapy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2025;279:289-386. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2025.05.039
    | |
  3. Syndrom sukhoho oka. Klinichna nastanova, zasnovana na dokazah [Dry eye syndrome. Evidence-based clinical practice]. 2019. Ukrainian. Available from: http://mtd.dec.gov.ua/index.php/uk/haluzevi-standarty-ta-klinichni-nas-tanovy/item/421-syndrom-sukhoho-oka
  4. Derzhavna Farmakopeia Ukrainy [The State Pharmacopoeia of Ukraine]. 2nd ed. Vol. 1. Kharkiv, (UA): State Enterprise Ukrainian Scientific Pharmacopoeial Center of Medicines Quality; 2015. Ukrainian.
  5. Andreadis II, Karavasili C, Thomas A, Komnenou A, Tzimtzimis M, Tzetzis D, et al. In Situ Gelling Electrospun Ocular Films Sustain the Intraocular Pressure-Lowering Effect of Timolol Maleate: In Vitro, Ex Vivo, and Pharmacodynamic Assessment. Mol Pharm. 2022;19(1):274-86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.1c00766
    | |
  6. Montmeat D, Thouvenin A, Rasamison R, Boudy V. Physicochemical Properties and Rheological Behavior of Artificial Tears for Dry Eye Syndrome. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2025;41(10):604-10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/10807683251364169
    | |
  7. Račić A, Krstonošić V, Micov A, Pecikoza U, Dobričić V, Turković E, et al. Stability and Efficacy of Mucoadhesive Eye Drops Containing Olopatadine HCl: Physicochemical, Functional, and Preclinical In Vivo Assessment. Pharmaceutics. 2025;17(4):517. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17040517
    | |
  8. Bhawale R, Srivastava V, Mehra NK. Advances in ophthalmic formulation development. In: Jain K, Yadav AK, editors. Advances in Pharmaceutical Product Development. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2025. p. 289-319. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-9230-6_12
  9. Thacker M, Singh V, Basu S, Singh S. Biomaterials for dry eye disease treatment: Current overview and future perspectives. Exp Eye Res. 2023;226:109339. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2022.109339
    | |
  10. Vega JF, Fernández M, Cardil A, Calafel I, Martínez-Soroa I, Sarriegui AP, et al. Shedding light on the viscoelastic behavior of artificial and human tears: A microrheological approach. Phys Fluids. 2023;35(7). doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0152482
    |
  11. Muñoz G, Millicovsky M, Cerrudo J, Peñalva A, Machtey M, Reta J, et al. Exploring tear viscosity with quartz crystal microbalance technology. Rev Sci Instrum. 2024;95(7):075107. doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0207182
    | |
  12. Blasco-Martinez A, Mateo-Orobia A, Blasco-Alberto J, Pablo-Julvez L. Rheological Behavior Patterns in Artificial Tears. Optom Vis Sci. 2022 May 1;99(5):455-62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000001885
    | |
  13. Tiffany JM, Winter N, Bliss G. Tear film stability and tear surface tension. Curr Eye Res. 1989;8(5):507-15. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/02713688909000031
    | |
  14. Nagyová B, Tiffany JM. Components responsible for the surface tension of human tears. Curr Eye Res. 1999;19(1):4-11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1076/ceyr.19.1.4.5341
    | |
  15. Hotujac Grgurević M, Juretić M, Hafner A, Lovrić J, Pepić I. Tear fluid-eye drops compatibility assessment using surface tension. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2017;43(2):275-82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03639045.2016.1238924
    | |
  16. Račić A, Krajišnik D. Biopolymers in Mucoadhesive Eye Drops for Treatment of Dry Eye and Allergic Conditions: Application and Perspectives. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(2):470. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15020470
    | |
  17. Ziliani S, Alekseeva A, Antonini C, Esposito E, Neggiani F, Sansò M, et al. Synthesis and Physiochemical Properties of Sulphated Tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) Seed Polysaccharide. Molecules. 2024;29(23):5510. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29235510
  18. Taranchuk MJ. Nematic Liquid Crystal Models for the Lipid Layer of the Human Tear Film. PhD thesis. University of Delaware; 2024.
  19. Miller R, Fainerman V. The drop volume technique. In: Studies in Interface Science. Elsevier; 1998. p. 139-86. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1383-7303(98)80020-3
  20. Mohamadkhani A. Methods of surface tension measurements. Academia.edu. 2014. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/11419575/2_Methods_of_surface_tension_measurements
  21. Pierson FW, Whitaker S. Studies of the drop-weight method for surfactant solutions. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1976;54(2):219-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(76)90302-7
    |
  22. Kloubek J. Measurement of the dynamic surface tension by the drop weighing method. Colloid and Polymer Scie. 1975;253:929-36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01421443
  23. Ramasami P, Rughooputh S. Accurate determination of surface tension using a Traube Stalagmometer and a low cost experimental design. University of Mauritius Research Journal. 2005;11:1-12. Available from: https://www.uom.ac.mu/researchjournal/index.php/research/article/view/215

Additional Files

Published

2026-06-26

How to Cite

1.
Ivanets LM, Vlasyuk MV. Biocompatibility assessment of lubricating ophthalmic agents in the context of their physicochemical characteristics. Current issues in pharmacy and medicine: science and practice [Internet]. 2026Jun.26 [cited 2026Jun.26];19(2):179-83. Available from: https://pharmed.zsmu.edu.ua/article/view/353713

Issue

Section

Original research