Studying awareness and attitude to vaccination in the context of professional training of future pharmacists
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14739/2409-2932.2025.3.330546Keywords:
vaccination, awareness, respondents, pharmacy, bioengineering, educational components, anonymous survey (E-Anquet)Abstract
The aim of the work is to conduct a comparative analysis of the attitude of higher education applicants in the specialties “Pharmacy”, “Biotechnology and Bioengineering” of the second (master’s) and third (doctor of philosophy) levels in different countries of the world (including Ukraine) towards the vaccination procedure for children and adults.
Materials and methods. The research methods were an anonymous survey using the E-survey, developed by the authors (20 questions), comparative analysis, statistical methods, and modeling. The research material is the respondents’ answers to the E-survey questions.
Results. The generalized profile of the respondents has been studied. It was found that in both experimental groups, most of the respondents (≈60 %) were young female people 17–21 years old (94.0 % of Ukrainian and 50.0 % of residents of other countries). The vast majority of domestic students (78.2 %) were originally from peasant families. The ranking of respondents by parental status was quite expected on the basis of their early age qualification. Only 1.2 % of Ukrainian respondents and 10.0 % of foreigners had children or reported pregnancy. It turned out that the decision of consent/refusal of vaccination was a conscious choice of the vast majority of students of both experimental groups. Thus, foreigners enter the ranks of students almost completely vaccinated from the COVID-19 (95.0 %), this indicator is also high for domestic respondents (74.3 %). Most of the respondents preferred the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, with almost 58 % of foreign respondents during the Deadline period (the indicator for Ukrainian respondents was approximately 4 %). A comparative analysis of the study on awareness, beliefs and relevant decisions of the respondents in the future, which will be made by them, differ significantly in representatives of different experimental groups. The full readiness of foreigners (100.0 %) for vaccination of their own children according to the vaccination calendar contracts with uncertainty (6.5 %) and a convinced refusal of vaccination (3.0 %) of future domestic specialists of pharmaceutical specialties.
Conclusions. The results of a comparative analysis of the distribution of respondents’ answers to the vaccination procedure and vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in particular by quantitative-quality methods are presented. The recognition of the need for the vast majority of respondents for additional knowledge about vaccines and vaccination procedures under the conditions of its professional conduct, a comparative analysis of this problem in general indicates the need for certain changes in the educational and educational process of preparation of pharmacists and biotechnologists of these educational and qualification levels.
References
Simons G. The Corona Virus pandemic and global transformations: Making or breaking international orders? Outl Glob Transform Politics Econ Law. 2020;13(5):20-37. doi: https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2020-13-5-2
Koronavirus: statystyka po krainakh [Coronavirus: statistics by country]. Minfin. 2024 [cited 2025 Aug 1]. Available from: https://index.minfin.com.ua/ua/reference/coronavirus/geography/2024
COVID-19 cases [Internet]. World Health Organization. [cited 2025 Aug 1]. Available from: https://covid19.who.int/2021
Kotsur N. [Specific prevention of infectious diseases: Scientific achievements and modern challenges]. Scientia et societus. 2022;1(1):86-9. Ukrainian. doi: https://doi.org/10.31470/2786-6327/2022/1/86-96
Horodovenko VV, Udovyka LG, Shekhovtsova TО. Vaccination in the system of human rights and obligations: impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Wiad Lek. 2021;74(11 cz 2):2983-91.
Besh LV, Dedyshyn LP, Metsyura OI, Gerasimov SV. [Multisystem inflammatory syndrome associated with COVID-2019 in children. Literature review and clinical cases. Odessa medical journal. 2024;(1):83-7. Ukrainian. doi: https://doi.org/10.32782/2226-2008-2024-1-13
Balandiukh ОV. [In Ukraine children were vaccinated from СOVID]. Zaxid.net. 2021 Nov 4 [cited 2025 Aug 1]. Ukrainian. Available from: https://zaxid.net/vaktsinatsiya_ditey_ukrayina_kogo_koli_yakoyu_vaktsinoyu_n1529557
Munro APS, Jones CE, Faust SN. Vaccination against COVID-19 - risks and benefits in children. Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Mar;183(3):1107-1112. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-023-05380-8
Krychkovska A, Konechna R, Bolibrukh L, Lopatynska O. Vaccine Prevention of Tuberculosis in Children: Outstanding Issues Family Medicine System in Ukraine. Archives of Pharmacy Practice. 2022;13(4):18-23. doi: https://doi.org/10.51847/OMcaXT87jE
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. [On Higher Education]. Law of Ukraine dated 2014 Jul 1 No. 1556-VII]. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1556-18?lang=en#Text
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 I. V. Bushuyeva, A. M. Krychkovska, O. F. Kuchmistova , O. I. Lopatynskа, R. T. Konechna, O. P. Shmatenko, O. I. Khomenko, O. I. Mayboroda

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
