Peculiarities of the course of gestation in women with a history of reproductive loss
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14739/2409-2932.2024.3.311119Keywords:
pregnancy, reproductive loss in history, extragenital pathology, complicationsAbstract
Aim. Тo assess the frequency of extragenital pathology, features of obstetric and gynecological history and the course of pregnancy in women with a history of reproductive loss.
Materials and methods. The study was conducted on the basis of the Municipal non-profit enterprise “Maternity house No. 9” of the Zaporizhzhia City Council with the involvement of 75 pregnant women with one reproductive loss in history. The control group consisted of 30 women without a history of reproductive loss. Women who had reproductive losses were divided into 2 groups. Group I (main group) includes 38 pregnant women who registered for pregnancy and began their participation in this study after the start of a full-scale war on the territory of Ukraine. II (comparison) group included 37 women who were registered for pregnancy before the start of the full-scale war. It should be noted that 17 pregnant women (44.7 %) had the status of an internally displaced person. The average age of women in group I was 30.10 ± 5.86 years, in group II – 28.80 ± 6.07 years, and 26.50 ± 4.95 years in the control group. The anamnesis data and features of the course of gestation were studied in all patients. Management of pregnancy and childbirth of women was carried out in accordance with the current Orders of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine. Variational and statistical processing of the results was carried out using the Statistica 13 program.
Results. According to the results of the study, it was established that the frequency of extragenital pathology in women with one reproductive loss was higher, compared to women who had no such experience. Diseases of the cardiovascular and urinary systems occupy a leading place in this category of women. According to obstetric and gynecological anamnesis, a significant predominance among women of I and II groups of diseases of the reproductive system, compared to women of the control group, was established. Also, in the corresponding groups, a high frequency of miscarriage was established both in the period up to 12 weeks (28.95 % in the I group, 43.2 % in the II group against 6.67 % in the control group), and in the period of 12–22 weeks (34.20 % in the I group, 29.73 % in the II group vs. 13.33 % in the control group).
Conclusions. Based on the conducted analysis, a high frequency of pregnancy complications was established for pregnant women who had a history of one reproductive loss. This contingent of women also has a high frequency of extragenital and gynecological concomitant pathology. Such results make it possible to assume a connection between the presence of one reproductive loss in women in the anamnesis and gestational complications of the next pregnancy.
References
Moiseienko RO, Zhylka NY, Gojda NG, Dudina OO, Golubchykov MV, Oktysiuk ZS. The state of female reproductive health in Ukraine. Ukraina. Zdorovia natsii. 2023;(1):51-9. Ukrainian. doi: https://doi.org/10.32782/2077-6594/2023.1/09
Mironiuk IS, Slabkii GО, Shcherbinska OS, Bilak-Lukianchuk VY. [Consequences of the war with the Russian Federation for the public health of Ukraine]. Ukraina. Zdorovia natsii. 2023;(3):100-5. Ukrainian. doi: https://doi.org/10.32782/2077-6594/2023.3/17
Shchorichnyi zvit pro stan zdorovia naselennia Ukrainy ta epidemichnu sytuatsiiu za 2022 rik [Annual report on the state of health of the population of Ukraine and the epidemic situation for 2022]. 2023 [cited 2024 Sep 10]. Ukrainian. Available from: https://moz.gov.ua/uk
Stratehiia demohrafichnoho rozvytku na period do 2040 roku (Proekt) [Strategy of demographic development of Ukraine for the period up to 2040 (Project)]. Ministry of Social Policy of Ukraine. 2024 Mar 28 [cited 2024 Sep 10]. Ukrainian. Available from: https://www.msp.gov.ua/projects/870/
Zhylka N, Shcherbinska O, Goida N, Golubchikov M. [The impact of national strategies for preserving reproductive health on the improvement of the demographic situation in Ukraine]. Reproductive Health of Woman. 2024;(4):8-15. Ukrainian. doi: https://doi.org/10.30841/2708-8731.4.2024.308990
Zharovska I, Blikhar M, Matkivska R, Malikov O, Cherkasova L. [Current global threats to the reproductive health of the nation: Literature review]. Reproductive endocrinology. 2024;72:8-16. Ukrainian. doi: https://doi.org/10.18370/2309-4117.2024.72.8-16
ESHRE Guideline Group on RPL, Bender Atik R, Christiansen OB, et al. ESHRE guideline: recurrent pregnancy loss: an update in 2022. Hum Reprod Open. 2023;2023(1):hoad002. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoad002
Liu C, Wei X, Wang F. The predictive value of ultrasound markers for pregnancy outcomes in recurrent pregnancy loss: a retrospective study. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):16657. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-67744-w
Tetruashvili N, Domar A, Bashiri A. Prevention of Pregnancy Loss: Combining Progestogen Treatment and Psychological Support. J Clin Med. 2023;24,12(5):1827. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12051827
Quenby S, Gallos ID, Dhillon-Smith RK, Podesek M, Stephenson MD, Fisher J, et al. Miscarriage matters: the epidemiological, physical, psychological, and economic costs of early pregnancy loss. Lancet. 2021;1,397(10285):1658-667. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00682-6
Ng KY, Cherian G, Kermack AJ, Bailey S, Macklon N, Sunkara SK, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of female lifestyle factors and risk of recurrent pregnancy loss. Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 29;11(1):7081. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86445-2.
Patel K, Pirie D, Heazell AE, Morgan B, Woolner A. Subsequent pregnancy outcomes after second trimester miscarriage or termination for medical/fetal reason: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024;103(3):413-22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14731
Wang Y, Meng Z, Pei J, Qian L, Mao B, Li Y, et al. Anxiety and depression are risk factors for recurrent pregnancy loss: a nested case-control study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021;8(19(1):78. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01703-1
ESHRE Guideline Group on RPL; Bender Atik R, Christiansen OB, Elson J, Kolte AM, Lewis S, et al. ESHRE guideline: recurrent pregnancy loss. Hum Reprod Open. 2018;6,2018(2):hoy004. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoy004
Donegan G, Noonan M, Bradshaw C. Parents experiences of pregnancy following perinatal loss: An integrative review. Midwifery. 2023;121:103673. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2023.103673
Yang X, Mu F, Zhang J, Yuan L, Zhang W, Yang Y, et al. Reproductive factors and subsequent pregnancy outcomes in patients with prior pregnancy loss. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024;25,24(1):219. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06422-1
Magnus MC, Wilcox AJ, Morken NH, Weinberg CR, Håberg SE. Role of maternal age and pregnancy history in risk of miscarriage: prospective register based study. BMJ. 2019;364:l869. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l869
Kolte AM, Westergaard D, Lidegaard Ø, Brunak S, Nielsen HS. Chance of live birth: a nationwide, registry-based cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2021;36(4):1065-1073. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa326
Dimitriadis E, Menkhorst E, Saito S, Kutteh WH, Brosens JJ. Recurrent pregnancy loss. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020;6(1):98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-020-00228-z
Coomarasamy A, Dhillon-Smith RK, Papadopoulou A, Al-Memar M, Brewin J, Abrahams VM, et al. Recurrent miscarriage: evidence to accelerate action. Lancet (London England). 2021;397(10285):1675-82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00681-4
Chen D, Xu Q, Mao X, Zhang J, Wu L. Reproductive history does not compromise subsequent live birth and perinatal outcome following in-vitro fertilization: analysis of 25 329 first frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecology: Official J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023;62(3):430-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.26220
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
