Results of a clinical trial of humeral neck osteosynthesis with carbon – carbon composite material
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14739/2409-2932.2023.3.286567Keywords:
osteosynthesis fracture, shoulder fractures, bone plates, surgery treatmentAbstract
The metals utilized in the production of various implants in traumatology possess all the required mechanical properties. However, these materials are susceptible to oxidation. Carbon-carbon composites, on the other hand, exhibit X-ray transparency and are easily machinable. Thanks to their intricate yet essential physical, mechanical, and chemical properties, they find effective application in osteosynthesis and endoprosthesis procedures for bone structures.
The aim of this study is to comparative view of the treatment outcomes for patients with fractures of the proximal part of the humerus by carbon-carbon composite material plates and titanium plates.
Materials and methods. In this study, a carbon-carbon composite material plate was conducted osteosynthesis of the proximal part of the shoulder. In the comparison group, a titanium plate was employed. The study group comprised 20 patients, while the comparison group included 15 patients. The analysis of the results was carried out utilizing the Constant–Murley scale and the Quick DASH questionnaire.
Results. A comparative study of treatment outcomes between the main and comparison groups revealed a more significant positive treatment effect in the group that underwent osteosynthesis of the humeral neck by a carbon-carbon composite material plate. This effect was observed at the 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month evaluation points. It was characterized by reduced shoulder pain, alleviated dysfunction manifestations, enhanced daily activities, and improved overall quality of life among patients in this group.
Conclusions. The analysis of long-term treatment outcomes for proximal humerus fractures, utilizing both carbon-carbon composite material plates and titanium plates, by the Constant–Murley scale and the Quick DASH questionnaire, demonstrated statistically confirmed improvements in shoulder joint function for both treatment methods.
References
Mînzatu, V., Davidescu, C. M., Negrea, P., Ciopec, M., Muntean, C., Hulka, I., Paul, C., Negrea, A., & Duțeanu, N. (2019). Synthesis, Characterization and Adsorptive Performances of a Composite Material Based on Carbon and Iron Oxide Particles. International journal of molecular sciences, 20(7), 1609. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20071609
Delaney, F. T., Denton, H., Dodds, M., & Kavanagh, E. C. (2021). Multimodal imaging of composite carbon fiber-based implants for orthopedic spinal fixation. Skeletal radiology, 50(5), 1039-1045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-020-03622-6
Cofano, F., Di Perna, G., Monticelli, M., Marengo, N., Ajello, M., Mammi, M., Vercelli, G., Petrone, S., Tartara, F., Zenga, F., Lanotte, M., & Garbossa, D. (2020). Carbon fiber reinforced vs titanium implants for fixation in spinal metastases: A comparative clinical study about safety and effectiveness of the new "carbon-strategy". Journal of clinical neuroscience, 75, 106-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2020.03.013
Nurettin, D., & Burak, B. (2018). Feasibility of carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer fixation plates for treatment of atrophic mandibular fracture: A finite element method. Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery, 46(12), 2182-2189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2018.09.030
Samiezadeh, S., Schemitsch, E. H., Zdero, R., & Bougherara, H. (2020). Biomechanical Response under Stress-Controlled Tension-Tension Fatigue of a Novel Carbon Fiber/Epoxy Intramedullary Nail for Femur Fractures. Medical engineering & physics, 80, 26-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2020.04.001
Elgali, I., Omar, O., Dahlin, C., & Thomsen, P. (2017). Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited. European journal of oral sciences, 125(5), 315-337. https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12364
Baba, K., Mikhailov, A., & Sankai, Y. (2019). Long-term safety of the carbon fiber as an implant scaffold material. Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference, 2019, 1105-1110. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2019.8856629
Wang, L., Li, G., Ren, L., Kong, X., Wang, Y., Han, X., Jiang, W., Dai, K., Yang, K., & Hao, Y. (2017). Nano-copper-bearing stainless steel promotes fracture healing by accelerating the callus evolution process. International journal of nanomedicine, 12, 8443-8457. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S146866
Dedukh, N. V., Karpinsky, M. J., Chzhou, L., & Malyshkina, S. V. (2016). Regeneratsiya i mekhanicheskaya prochnost kosti v usloviyakh implantatsii uglerodnogo materiala [Regeneration and mechanical strength of bone in the implantation conditions of carbon material]. Ortopediya, travmatologiya i protezirovanie, (3), 41-47. [in Russian]. https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872016341-47
Korzh, N. A., Dedukh, N. V., Tyazhelov, A. A., & Chzhou, L. (2017) Eksperimentalno-klinicheskoe issledovanie primenenyia uglerodnykh biomaterialov v ortopedyi i travmatologyi (obzor literatury) [Experimental clinical study of the use of carbon biomaterials in orthopedics and traumatology (literature review)]. Ortopediya, travmatologiya i protezirovanie, (2), 114-121. [in Russian]. https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-598720172114-121
Teuben, M. P. J., Hofman, M., Shehu, A., Greven, J., Qiao, Z., Jensen, K. O., Hildebrand, F., Pfeifer, R., & Pape, H. C. (2020). The impact of intramedullary nailing on the characteristics of the pulmonary neutrophil pool in rodents. International orthopaedics, 44(3), 595-602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-019-04419-6
Shiels, S. M., Bouchard, M., Wang, H., & Wenke, J. C. (2018). Chlorhexidine-releasing implant coating on intramedullary nail reduces infection in a rat model. European cells & materials, 35, 178-194. https://doi.org/10.22203/eCM.v035a13
Danoff, J. R., Aurégan, J. C., Coyle, R. M., Burky, R. E., & Rosenwasser, M. P. (2016). Augmentation of Fracture Healing Using Soft Callus. Journal of orthopaedic trauma, 30(3), 113-118. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000481
Barabás, R., de Souza Ávila, E., Ladeira, L., Antônio, L., Tötös, R., Simedru, D., Bizo, L., & Cadar, O. (2019). Graphene Oxides/Carbon Nanotubes–Hydroxyapatite Nanocomposites for Biomedical Applications. Arabian journal for science and engineering, 45(1), 219-227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-019-04058-4
Wright, Z. M., Arnold, A. M., Holt, B. D., Eckhart, K. E., & Sydlik, S. A. (2019). Functional Graphenic Materials, Graphene Oxide, and Graphene as Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration. Regenerative Engineering and Translational Medicine, 5(2), 190-209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40883-018-0081-z
Shin, Y. C., Song, S. J., Jeong, S. J., Kim, B., Kwon, I. K., Hong, S. W., Oh, J. W., & Han, D. W. (2018). Graphene-Based Nanocomposites as Promising Options for Hard Tissue Regeneration. Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 1078, 103-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0950-2_6
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
