Acceptability criteria for linear dependence in validating UV-spectrophotometric methods of quantitative determination in forensic and toxicological analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14739/2409-2932.2014.2.26124Keywords:
Validation Studies, Ultraviolet Spectrophotometry, DoxylamineAbstract
Introduction. This article is the result of authors’ research in the field of development of the approaches to validation of quantitative determination methods for purposes of forensic and toxicological analysis and devoted to the problem of acceptability criteria formation for validation parameter «linearity/calibration model».
The aim of research. The purpose of this paper is to analyse the present approaches to acceptability estimation of the calibration model chosen for method description according to the requirements of the international guidances, to form the own approaches to acceptability estimation of the linear dependence when carrying out the validation of UV-spectrophotometric methods of quantitative determination for forensic and toxicological analysis.
Materials and methods. UV-spectrophotometric method of doxylamine quantitative determination in blood.
Results. The approaches to acceptability estimation of calibration models when carrying out the validation of bioanalytical methods is stated in international papers, namely «Guidance for Industry: Bioanalytical method validation» (U.S. FDA, 2001), «Standard Practices for Method Validation in Forensic Toxicology» (SWGTOX, 2012), «Guidance for the Validation of Analytical Methodology and Calibration of Equipment used for Testing of Illicit Drugs in Seized Materials and Biological Specimens» (UNODC, 2009) and «Guideline on validation of bioanalytical methods» (ЕМА, 2011) have been analysed.
It has been suggested to be guided by domestic developments in the field of validation of analysis methods for medicines and, particularly, by the approaches to validation methods in the variant of the calibration curve method for forming the acceptability criteria of the obtained linear dependences when carrying out the validation of UV-spectrophotometric methods of quantitative determination for forensic and toxicological analysis. The choice of the method of calibration curve is dictated by the primary orientation of all studied international guidances on the work exactly by this method.
The next criteria and the order of acceptability estimation of linearity for UV-spectrophotometric methods of quantitative determination analyses in biological fluids used in forensic and toxicological analysis have been offered:
- acceptability estimation of linear dependence parameters is carried out in two stages – for the lines obtained using model solutions (without matrix) and calibration samples respectively;
- two approaches has been suggested for parameters estimation of linear dependence obtained using model solutions; they are based on: 1) assumption of equality of the uncertainty related to the procedure of sample preparation of calibration standards, and the uncertainty of the calibration curve plotted by model solutions; 2) assumption of insignificance of the uncertainty of the calibration curve plotted by model solutions; for both approaches the acceptability criteria have been offered for residual standard deviation and correlation coefficient ;
- for estimation of parameters of linear dependence obtained using calibration samples it has been suggested to proceed from assumption of equality of the calibration uncertainty and the uncertainty of measuring the absorbance and sample preparation of the sample to be analysed; within this approach the acceptability criteria have been offered for residual standard deviation RSD0 and correlation coefficient Rс; the parameters of within-run (within-day) and between-run (between-day) linearity should satisfy these criteria.
Conclusion. The criteria and order of acceptability estimation of linearity for UV-spectrophotometric methods of quantitative determination analyses in biological fluids used in forensic and toxicological analysis have been formed. Offered approaches have been tested by example of UV-spectrophotometric method of doxylamine quantitative determination in blood.
References
Klimenko, L. Yu., & Petyunin, G. P. (2013) Analiz podkhodov k opredeleniyu specifichnosti/selektivnosti pri provedenii validacii analiticheskikh metodik v sudebno-toksikologicheskom analize [Analysis of approaches to determination of specificity/selectivity when carrying out the validation of analytical methods in forensic and toxicological analysis]. Ukrainskyi medychnyi almanakh, 16(1), 47–49. [in Ukrainian].
Klimenko, L. Yu., Petyunin, G. P., & Kostina, T. A. (2013) Podkhody k opredeleniyu specifichnosti/selektivnosti pri validacii UF-spektrofotometricheskikh metodik kolichestvennogo opredeleniya v sudebno-toksikologicheskom analize [Approaches to determination of specificity/selectivity when validating UV-spectrophotometric methods of quantitative determination in forensic and toxicological analysis]. Farmaciya Kazakhstana, 8, 53–56. [in Kazakhstan].
Klimenko, L. Yu., Trut, S. M., Petyunin, G. P., & Ivanchuk, I. M. (2013) Modifikaciya i validaciya UF-spektrofotometricheskoj metodiki kolichestvennogo opredeleniya doksilamina v krovi: specifichnost'/selektivnost' [Modification and validation of UV-spectrophotometric method of doxylamine quantitative determination in blood: specificity/selectivity]. Ukrains’kyi zhurnal klinichnoi ta laboratornoi medytsyny, 8(4), 191–199. [in Ukrainian].
Klimenko, L. Yu., Trut, S. M., Petyunin, G. P., & Ivanchuk, I. M. (2013) Validation of UV-spectrophotometric methods of quantitative determination in forensic and toxicological analysis: recovery. Farmaciya Kazakhstana, 12, 42–48. [in Kazakhstan].
Klimenko, L. Yu., Trut, S. M., Petyunin, G. P., & Akhmedov, E. Yu. (2014) Validation of UV-spectrophotometric methods of quantitative determination in forensic and toxicological analysis: linearity and range. Farmatsevtychnyi chasopys, 30(1), 41–52.
(2001) Guidance for Industry: Bioanalytical Method Validation. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Center for Drug Evolution and Research (CDER), Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
(2012) Standard Practices for Method Validation in Forensic Toxicology (draft). Scientific Working Group for Forensic Toxicology (SWGTOX).
(2009) Guidance for the Validation of Analytical Methodology and Calibration of Equipment used for Testing of Illicit Drugs in Seized Materials and Biological Specimens. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Laboratory and Scientific Section. New York: United Nations.
(2009) Guideline on bioanalytical method validation. European Medicines Agency. Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). London.
Gryzodub, O. I., Levashova, O. L., & Borshhevskiy, G. I. (2011) Standartizovannaya procedura validacii metodik atomno-absorbcionnogo kolichestvennogo opredeleniya lekarstvennykh sredstv v variante kalibrovochnogo grafika [Standardized validation procedure for atomic absorption assays of medicines using calibration line]. Farmakom, 4, 5–26. [in Ukrainian].
Gryzodub, O. I. (2011) Standartizovannye procedury validacii metodik kontrolya kachestva lekarstvennykh sredstv [Standardized validation procedures for methods of medicines quality control]. Analiticheskaya khimiya v sozdanii, standartizacii i kontrole kachestva lekarstvennykh sredstv – Analytical Chemistry in the Development, Standardization and Quality Control of Medications. Kharkiv: НТМТ, 2011, (3), 934–1063. [in Ukrainian].
Doerffel, K. (1994) Statistika v analiticheskoj khimii [Statistics in analytical chemistry]. Moscow: Mir. [in Russian].
Moffat, A. C., Osselton, M. D., & Widdop B. (2011) Clarke’s analysis of drugs and poisons in pharmaceuticals, body fluids and postmortem material. London: Pharmaceutical Press.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)